14 November 2014

The western and central Pacific Ocean is home to the world’s largest tuna fishing grounds, with more than half of the world’s tuna catch coming from this region. Tuna resources are integral to many coastal state economies, providing tens of thousands of jobs. Coastal States and fishing nations will meet this December for the 11th Regular Session of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), the governing body for tuna stocks and the associate marine ecosystems of the region. As always, there is a great deal at stake and our coalition has a list of things we would like to see member nations accomplish.

You can download our position statement from our library or you can use this page filled with interactive links to learn more about the issues that matter most, including improved conservation for tunas and sharks and strengthened compliance.

The global demand for access to wild fish is growing, which only serves to increase the pressure placed on all tuna stocks. In order to remain robust and sustainable, the Pacific Ocean needs our support now more than ever.

Global Issues


Harvest Control Rules (HCRs) and Reference Points

HCRs are a set of well-defined management actions to be taken in response to changes in stock status with respect to target and limit reference points. Unless there is a pre-agreed upon action plan for avoiding overfishing or for rebuilding an overfished stock, long negotiations lead to delayed action or inaction. This delay can lead to further damage to the stock, requiring even more aggressive curtailing of fishing. The adoption of HCRs is a key aspect of modern fisheries management, and is also a requirement of several eco-label certification programs.

  Click here to read a blog about the importance of HCRs
Click here to watch a video about HCRs  |  Click here to download a report on HCRs

In 2012, the WCPFC adopted limit reference points for skipjack, bigeye, yellowfin and South Pacific albacore. This was an important first step. Now the WCPFC needs to adopt target reference points for these same stocks. ISSF supports the adoption of the stock-specific target reference points and the recommendations by SC9 regarding calculating uncertainty. ISSF looks forward to substantial progress on adoption of target reference points and HCRs for skipjack at WCPFC11 through the adoption of the proposed work plan for the development and implementation of target reference points and HCRs.


Closed Vessel Registries and Management of Fleet 
Capacity

Experts agree that there is overcapacity in the global tuna fleets. Fishing fleet overcapacity increases pressure to weaken management measures and eventually leads to stock overexploitation. The first step towards managing capacity is to establish limited entry via a comprehensive closed vessel registry with an eye towards ultimately reducing the number of fishing vessels to an appropriate level.

Click here to watch a video on capacity Click here to learn about ISSF’s capacity resolution

To underscore this importance of this issue, in October ISSF clarified its Resolution to Limit the Growth in Fishing Capacity of the Global Large-Scale Tropical Tuna Purse Seine Fleet. Through this Resolution, ISSF Participating Companies must refrain from transactions in skipjack, bigeye and yellowfin tuna caught by large scale purse seine vessels that are not actively fishing for tuna, or under contract for construction, as of December 31, 2012 or a replacement for an existing vessel.

ISSF urges the WCPFC to establish limited entry through closed vessel registries and to develop a common currency to measure fishing capacity, such as cubic meters of well volume. ISSF also supports the Kobe III call for creating mechanisms to transfer capacity to developing countries.

These steps should be taken now, since scaling back purse seine fleet capacity will become even more difficult as new vessels are introduced. Given the importance of a mechanism to transfer capacity to developing countries to any regional capacity management scheme, ISSF hosted a Workshop in March 2014 to start a dialogue on this issue. ISSF hopes this Workshop and dialog will contribute to progressing capacity management in the tuna RFMOs.

Click here to review the Capacity Transfer Workshop Report.

 

Fish Aggregating Device (FAD) Management  
Setting on FADs accounts for nearly 40% of global tuna catches and 50% of global skipjack catches. FADs are one of the most important fishing methods for tropical tunas. Surprisingly, however, there are huge gaps in all RFMOs regarding the number of FADs being used and on details of fishing operations on individual FADs. Observer programs can be used to collect much – but not all – of the information needed to appropriately monitor FADs. Vessel operators can complement this information as well as provide additional information on individual FADs. Collection and reporting of data that can be used to measure fishing effort by FADs is simply a must.

Click here for a video on managing floating objects

ISSF urges the WCPFC to take two actions this year: (1) ensure that the regional observer program routinely collects the FAD data in the WCPFC Minimum Standard Fields, and (2) expand the information required from vessels to include data on FAD deployments, designs, equipment and identification marks.

ISSF strongly supports the SC10 and TCC10 recommendations for the creation of a Working Group on FAD management. ISSF urges the Working Group to adopt Terms of Reference that address (i) FAD marking, and identification, and use of electronic signatures; and, (ii) FAD monitoring, tracking and control.

Click here to download non-entangling FAD designs | Click here for a video on saving sharks & turtles

 

WCPFC Conservation & Management Measures


CMM 2012-01, the 
Purse Seine Fishery and bigeye tuna
The analyses presented at SC10 corroborate the fact that CMMs adopted by WCPFC to end the overfishing of bigeye have been ineffective. Overfishing continues and the stock is now below the Limit Reference Point adopted by the Commission. The purse seine fishery continues to increase, with record catches in 2013, when the bigeye catch by this gear was clearly the highest ever. In addition, the longline fishery has a similar impact on the reproductive capacity of the stock as the purse seine fishery does. Overall, fishing mortality on the stock needs to be reduced by 36% in order to end overfishing.

Click here to read a blog on Pacific bigeye |

Dive into the details about the current state of tuna stocks in the Pacific Ocean & around the world!

CMM-2013-01 is overly complex and has too many exemptions and optional clauses, which render it ineffective and difficult to enforce. The WCPFC could consider adding other incremental measures to the CMM (such as extending the FAD closure period, limiting the number of FAD sets made each year or the number of FADs that each vessel uses), but this is what has been done since 2009 and it is clearly not effective. ISSF urges the WCPFC to eliminate the exemptions in the CMM and to adopt management measures that are effective and easier to enforce, such as a total fishery closure (potentially with two closure periods) or a reduction in fishing effort, to meet the objective of ending the overfishing of the bigeye stock.


Sharks

SC10 recommended a number of longline shark mitigation methods. ISSF notes that shark lines are used in many fisheries and these catch mostly silky and oceanic whitetip sharks. Since the retention of these species is prohibited, ISSF urges WCPFC to prohibit the use of shark lines in order to improve compliance.

ISSF is encouraged that FFA, USA and the EU are seeking the adoption of a comprehensive and robust shark conservation and management measures that includes the removal of the 5% fin-to-weight ratio, which was highlighted at TCC10 as being an area of non‐compliance. ISSF supports amending CMM 2010-07 to mandate that fins remain naturally attached for all sharks landed. Moreover, the CMM should include the implementation of a range of proven shark catch mitigation measures, improved data collection and reporting, and the development of stock-specific reference points.

Click here to read a technical report on bycatch in purse seine fisheries | Access our guidebooks that feature best practices for shark handling and bycatch mitigation practices | Click here for a blog on shark bycatch research


Longlining and Transshipment

ISSF notes with concern the low levels of observer coverage and the failure of some CCMs to provide the required transshipment reports or advance notifications. Meanwhile, electronic monitoring systems (EMS) are being tested and developed, which could potentially be used to address some of these problems.

Click here to review the use of EMS as an alternative or complement to human observer programs

ISSF urges WCPFC to impose and enforce, as a precautionary measure, measures to limit longliner capacity in the Convention Area. ISSF also urges the Commission to task its scientific body to make recommendations regarding the levels of longline capacity consistent with sustainable exploitation and prudent management of target tuna stocks. ISSF further urges the Commission to amend its transshipment measure (CMM 2009-06) in order to address these significant gaps in its effectiveness, which affect traceability of the products and could result in IUU fishing.


Compliance and Data Gaps

ISSF notes with concern the SC10 information about the lack of operational data for longline fleets in the high seas, which affected the quality of the bigeye assessment reported at SC10. ISSF strongly urges all CCMs to meet their obligations regarding data submissions and provide these operational data to the SPC by the agreed deadlines and in the correct formats. ISSF further urges the Commission to consider appropriate responses to promote compliance by those CCMs who have not yet provided operational catch and effort data.

ISSF continues to be concerned with the lack of transparency in the WCPFC Compliance Monitoring Scheme (CMS). In contrast to the other four tuna RFMOs, observers are not allowed in the CMS working group meetings and the responses of members to identified non‐compliance are not released. Member reports on the implementation of WCPFC measures are also confidential. ISSF urges the endorsement of TCC10’s recommendation to amend CMM 2013-02 and for the Commission to allow accredited observers to attend the working group meetings. ISSF also urges the Commission to release information on how CCM’s respond to and plan to address the areas of identified non-compliance be made public. We also support the development of a scheme of responses to non-compliance by the Commission as soon as possible.

Click here to download a report on compliance in RFMOs.


Transparency in Access, Joint Venture and Chartering Arrangements

ISSF recognizes the importance of access and chartering or joint venture arrangements to the development aspirations of developing States, in particular small island developing States. It is also equally important for accurate stock assessments and effective compliance and enforcement that there is clarity regarding catch attribution and the responsible party for MCS regarding vessels under chartering or access arrangements. ISSF urges the WCPFC to adopt measures to promote transparency in access agreements and chartering or joint venture arrangements that are similar to existing IOTC and ICCAT measures.